ERDI LRF Specs

Home › Guide › Laser safety

Laser safety for integrators: what the module's class does and does not cover

A module datasheet says "Class 1". That statement is about the module. Your product needs its own classification, and the difference between the two is where builds fail certification.

Why 1535 nm exists at all

At 905 nm, light passes the cornea and is focused onto the retina, so the permissible exposure is low and the pulse energy a product may emit is small. Above roughly 1400 nm, water absorption in the cornea and lens removes the beam before the retina, so the permissible exposure is roughly two orders of magnitude higher. That is the entire technical reason a 23 km rangefinder can exist at 400 g — not better optics, a different hazard.

"Eye-safe" describes a wavelength band. It is not a certificate, and it does not transfer from the module to your product.

What changes when you integrate

What to ask your module supplier for

  1. The module's own classification statement, with the standard it was assessed against (IEC 60825-1 is the common one) and the revision year.
  2. Pulse energy, pulse width and repetition rate — the three inputs to any exposure calculation.
  3. Beam divergence and the aperture dimensions, so your integrator can redo the assessment with your optics in place.
  4. Whether the classification was assessed on the bare module or on a reference configuration.

What the classification does not tell you

It does not tell you that your product is safe, that your export classification is settled, or that a customer's safety officer will accept it. Those are three separate conversations, and the third one is usually where a design-in stalls.

Need the module documents for an assessment? Ask per model: classification statement, pulse energy, width, repetition rate, divergence, aperture. Email tommy@erdimail.com Why the wavelengths differ

This page describes the integration problem, not a compliance conclusion. Classification of a finished product requires an assessment against the applicable standard by a competent person.